Yes, in selected Gospels,
Jesus and some disciples were in the house of a leper,
along with Himself, around the worst sort of outcast,
flaunting Jesus’ so-called solidarity with the decrepit and marginalized.
Not necessarily,
see, as these are all quite assumed,
from both sides of the case,
whether the woman did spend her whole savings,
or easily a large proportion of it,
for that alabaster jar,
in order to give her personal way of praise and devotion to Jesus,
who supposedly believes on His own, mind you,
that berating her simply for her sincerity of heart,
should be considered most inappropriate,
and also suspiciously hinged on shady motivations,
hinting toward His position instead,
since Jesus needn’t resort to, as you stress,
a declared scolding,
I certainly didn’t suggest anything of His or your kind,
yet akin to everything in honest education,
something completely alien to pompous Jesus,
one only gently shows to everybody involved,
the true error in this alleged rash decision,
while directing how to properly rectify the situation.
But this of course ought to have been dealt with,
obviously long in advance from our reasonably late event in play,
after all, He should have had folks put straight at His very beginnings,
just as I’ve said before though, Jesus ain’t really here to actually teach people,
it’s mainly for His utterly self-serving mission,
thus is quite the contrary to any mistakenly perceived standings,
He is desperately trying to occupy,
with the overwhelming focus,
tightly across this presumed mighty importance of Himself,
because He is merely going to be in their presence for a short measure,
so best give reverence and attention within the time allowed,
even if it were to draw some morsel above the poor,
we still understand His hypocrisy,
at least I do,
hence one learns more and lasting from this brash example,
putting His words already rarely into movement,
which is clearly not being demonstrated inside this passage as well.
Sharwrong's Song 