See, if Christianity didn’t have the Old Testament in tow,
then at least it could better attempt to push its assertions,
like some from the Sermon on the Mount,
for example: ‘Hey, guys, you seriously gotta love each other,’
along with a lot more such garbage in the general vein,
not that it’s going to still make much sense anyway,
because the message is so forced and contrived,
yet it wouldn’t have revealed its own true ignorance too,
when it comes to trying to adopt another’s religion.
Right, it is easy to see how they got this sacrificial idea,
but that does not leave them anywhere near less unaware,
of prior Jewish text though,
with the New Testament’s flagrant indiscretion,
they were extremely far behind of what they should have been able to find,
as a supposed relation.
Behold, what’s known as the ‘blood sacrifice’ or ‘sin offering,’
is performed only by a Levite priest,
on just clean animals of a distinct species,
claiming no marks on their bodies,
which follows a fate that needs to be quick,
using a very sharp knife as to not cause the captive suffering,
where the blood has to fall across a holy altar.
Now, this purely displays that a human crucifixion,
was strictly forbidden as a proper replacement,
since this is Jesus’ so-called whole contribution,
hardly from an actual pious and innocent victim either,
also as Numbers 15:27-31 clearly points out,
it was used for mere unintentional sins,
having the alternative of being simply put to death.
Sharwrong's Song 